<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>uFunctional LLC &#187; Waterfall (SDLC)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ufunctional.com/category/software-development/waterfall-sdlc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ufunctional.com</link>
	<description>Software Development Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Robert presenting at HTHH Pecha Kucha on Thursday 11/18</title>
		<link>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/11/14/robert-presenting-at-hthh-pecha-kucha-on-thursday-1118/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/11/14/robert-presenting-at-hthh-pecha-kucha-on-thursday-1118/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Merrill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterfall (SDLC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufunctional.com/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m speaking at the High-Tech Happy Hour&#8217;s Pecha Kucha this Thursday the 18th sometime between 3:00 PM and 4:30 PM. “A Tale of Two Processes” shows what happens to a hypothetical twelve-feature, one-year project when run following first the waterfall SDLC and second an agile method, assuming that the estimate/commitment is too low by one-third. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/11/14/robert-presenting-at-hthh-pecha-kucha-on-thursday-1118/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank you, WI BADD</title>
		<link>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/10/06/thank-you-wi-badd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/10/06/thank-you-wi-badd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Merrill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Set-Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterfall (SDLC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufunctional.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank You to the three Wisconsin IIBA chapters who hosted the fourth annual WI BADD™ on Tuesday, 10/5/2010, and the firms that sponsored it. I met some new people and learned some new things, and I know that was a lot of work to put on. Thanks also to the enthusiastic audience for my talk, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/10/06/thank-you-wi-badd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deniability and Software–Ouch!</title>
		<link>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/04/26/deniability-and-software-ouch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/04/26/deniability-and-software-ouch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Merrill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software-Intensive Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterfall (SDLC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufunctional.com/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve long told my customers that big waterfall software specs are more like insurance policies than blueprints, especially when I hear the phrase “sign-off” more than once a week. They are part of Covey the Younger’s Trust Tax. But in Deniability, Seth Godin puts it better that I ever could. “At some point, that effort [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ufunctional.com/2010/04/26/deniability-and-software-ouch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waterfall, RUP, and Agile: Which is Right for You?</title>
		<link>http://www.ufunctional.com/2009/12/17/waterfall-rup-and-agile-which-is-right-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ufunctional.com/2009/12/17/waterfall-rup-and-agile-which-is-right-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Merrill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterfall (SDLC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ufunctional.com/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Serhiy Kharytonov published a fine summary of software methodologies for non-technical leaders at Executive Brief. He makes several excellent observations, but he also perpetuates a destructive myth. I&#8217;ve worked with all three of Waterfall, RUP, and Agile, and here&#8217;s my take. Excellent observations Then, stay agile in the approach to the process itself, constantly looking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ufunctional.com/2009/12/17/waterfall-rup-and-agile-which-is-right-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

